Overview
Alignment with Be You Domains
-
Mentally Healthy Communities
-
Family Partnerships
-
Learning Resilience
-
Early Support
-
Responding Together
Alignment with Early Years Learning Framework (EYLF)
- Children are confident and involved learners
- Children are connected with and contribute to their world
- Children are effective communicators
- Children have a strong sense of identity
- Children have a strong sense of wellbeing
Alignment with Australian Curriculum
- Humanities and Social Sciences
- Languages
- Mathematics
- Science
- Technologies
Target audience
- Early learning
- Primary school
Target groups
- Whole class
- Whole school
Aims
MindUP’s program is an evidence-based social and emotional learning program grounded in neuroscience. The MIndUP curriculum builds awareness and skills to increase prosocial behavior, executive functioning and social and emotional competence in children and young people from ages 3 to 14. MindUP teaches children and young people how to focus their attention, use brain breaks to manage stress, act with empathy and build resilience in the face of challenge.Program theory
MindUP used the four pillars of neuroscience, positive psychology, mindful awareness and social and emotional learning. The program uses the evidence-based CASEL competencies, which include social awareness, responsible decision making, relationship skills, self-management and self-awareness. The Personal and Social Capabilities from the Australian Curriculum are mapped to the CASEL competencies, and each of the MindUP lessons maps against each of the Personal and Social Capabilities.Topics
The MindUp curriculum is a series of 17 lessons which work together. Topics include building community, understanding the brain, learning to be mindful, mindful senses (listening, seeing, smelling, tasting, touch and movement), exploring feelings, perspective-taking, empathy, optimism, gratitude, kindness, and mindful actions in our community.Cost
Program structure
There are 2 elements to the MindUP program: 1. Training educators and school staff. This requires a minimum of 5 hours of training that can be completed asynchronously or synchronously. There are additional training and mentorship programs to support adult self-care and communities of practice. 2. Implementing the lessons with students. There are 17 lessons that each take approximately 30 to 45 minutes. We also ask for the educators to practice daily skills, such as completing brain breaks with their students. This takes 5 minutes daily.Instructor
Not provided
Instructor training
There are 3 elements to the train-the-trainer program: 1. Pre-work (5 hours), which includes reading and completing online training. 2. Synchronous virtual training (6 hours), which includes 5 sessions that vary between 60 to 90 minutes. 3. Assignments for assessment (2 to 3 hours).Supporting resources or materials available with program
- Manual
- Online webinars
- Workbook
Ongoing support
There are 2 support mechanisms: 1. Online platform membership, through which trainers receive professional learning opportunities, access to a training community to ask questions and resources to support implementation. 2. Coaching and mentorship sessions, which includes one-on-one support from a MindUP training consultant.Parent involvement
- Attend information sessions
- Follow-up information provided after program
Origin of program
International
The Goldie Hawn Foundation
Program authors
Dr Molly Lawlor, educators and other experts that advise The Goldie Hawn Foundation
- 220 26th Street,Santa Monica 90402 United States of America (USA)
Ratings
Summary of evidence factors
This is a summary of the evaluation or research study characteristics that contribute to the program’s evidence rating.
Positive impact on at least one outcome for children and/or young people?
The study reported positive outcomes. |
Yes |
---|---|
Link between program description and theory of change
Theory of change refers to whether there was a comprehensive description and illustration of how and why a desired change is expected to happen in a particular context. |
Comprehensive |
Study design
Type of study design reported. |
Randomised control trial |
Independence
The degree to which the program authors were involved in the research. |
Completely |
Summary of implementation factors
This is a summary of the program’s characteristics that contribute to its implementation rating.
Feedback sought from participants
Participants enjoyed the program and understood its benefits. |
Yes |
---|---|
Feedback sought from instructors
Instructors enjoyed the program and understood its benefits. |
Yes |
Groups program is not suitable for
Groups the program wouldn't be suitable for or that required further research to determine suitability. |
Not assessed |
Training provided during study
The model of training provided. |
Face to face, all instructors, in person |
Ongoing instructor support provided during study
Whether ongoing support is provided. |
Yes |
Context
This is a summary of the context in which the evidence for the program was established.
Study Participants
Pre school, primary school (Foundation to Year 6), secondary school (Years 7 to 12). |
Early learning Primary school Secondary school |
---|---|
Country of Study/s
The location in which the evidence or research was conducted. |
International |
Evaluation of program in culturally and linguistically diverse populations
Provider has included culturally and linguistically diverse people when assessing the program. |
Yes |
Evaluation of program in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children and young people
Provider has included Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples when assessing the program. |
No |
Evaluation of program in low socioeconomic groups
Program has evaluated a diverse socio-economic population in their research. |
Yes |
Developmental based adaptations to program design and delivery
Shorter sessions for younger students or activities are adjusted for age appropriateness. |
No |
Evaluation of program in children and young people with disability and/or learning difference
Provider has included participants with a disability or learning difference when assessing the program. |
Yes |
Last updated: 16 September 2021